Judicial Review Into DWP’s Disabled Benefits ‘Fiasco’

Reposted from Irwin Mitchell Solicitors website

Legal Experts Say Vulnerable People ‘Left In Lurch’ By Delays In Vital Payments

25/02/2015

Expert lawyers have been given the green light to launch a judicial review into the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP’s) system for providing essential payments to disabled families, on behalf of vulnerable people who have been “left in the lurch” and have faced waits of up to 13 months for vital support.

Irwin Mitchell’s specialist public lawyers have been granted permission for the legal challenge in relation to Personal Independence Payments (PIP), after hearing numerous first-hand accounts from those who have faced serious financial hardship after experiencing delays in receiving the funds.

Introduced to replace Disability Living Allowance from April 2013, PIP is designed to help disabled adults to meet extra costs as a result of disability, including basic essentials such as food, heating and transport.

While the DWP estimated the process for applying for payments would take just two and a half months, of the 529,400 claimants who had registered for PIP assessments between April 2013 and July 2014 only 206,000 had received a final determination. This means that more than 300,000 applicants who applied since April 2013 were still awaiting a determination by the end of July 2014.

The problems with the scheme were described by Public Accounts Committee chair Margaret Hodge in June last year as “nothing short of a fiasco”, while the delays were also discussed at a Department for Work and Pensions Committee meeting in January.

Irwin Mitchell’s Public Law team, which has already successfully helped seven people to obtain decisions on PIP after launching legal action on their behalf, have now been given permission to launch a judicial review with the aim of improving the system for others affected. The action is on the grounds that delays of more than six months amount to a failure to reach a decision in reasonable time.

Anne-Marie Irwin We are delighted to have been given permission to ensure that the voices of thousands of disabled people can finally be heard on this issue.

“While we have helped a number of clients obtain decisions on PIP, it is worrying that the DWP’s approach has been to fast-track those who are taking legal action but not address the situation for the many people who continue to face delays and – as a result – are unable to pay for essentials such as food and heating.

“This has left our clients struggling to cope financially, with the strain and stress of these issues having a significant impact on their health and wellbeing.

“Simply too many people have been left in the lurch as a result of these issues and we hope that our legal challenge will lead to the vital improvements that are needed to ensure that disabled people up and down the country can get the support they need.”

Among those that Irwin Mitchell has representing in relation to the issue is Ms C – who cannot be named – from Kent, who suffers from severe depression and was diagnosed with ME and high blood pressure in 2009. This condition causes severe physical exhaustion and a host of other health problems. She applied for PIPs in January 2014 after her worsening condition meant she was forced to leave her job, but she did not receive PIP until October, the day after court proceedings were issued.

Ms C said: “The delay had a massive impact on my life. I applied for PIPs so I could look after myself, but without it I could barely eat and only ever left my house for a weekly trip to a supermarket.

“I was completely isolated during the nine months I was waiting for my payments. While my wait came to an end, it is worrying that many, many others have still not received a decision.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in DWP and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Judicial Review Into DWP’s Disabled Benefits ‘Fiasco’

  1. sdbast says:

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

    Like

  2. there is no penalty for late payment. No definition of a reasonable time in which payment must be made. No compensation for losses caused by late payment. If the applicant dies before payment is made, does the money owed go to the Estate? They are obviously “playing by the rules”. System definitely ” needs improved”.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Unless Maladministration can be proved and I believe due to the #DWPChaos many claims do indeed fall under Maladministration.

      Liked by 1 person

      • @ Leon Carter – How can Maladministration be proved? Say an applicant has provided a Doctors note, waited 6 months without result – what would they do next? What can claimants do if the office loses their medical records or claims to have written to them regarding appointments but the claimant received no letter. How does the claimant obtain proof? Could you explain “maladministration”?

        Like

  3. stewilko says:

    Reblogged this on stewilko's Blog and commented:
    Brilliant

    Like

  4. leonc1963 says:

    Reblogged this on Diary of an SAH Stroke Survivor and commented:
    They really do need suing but due to the cuts in legal aid too many just cannot afford the costs of such an action should they lose we need the legal profession on our side who are not scared of the DWP bullies and willing to front the cost of a few claims as only that will bring it to an end

    Like

  5. Tommaz Jay says:

    DWP personal playing the same dangerous mind games that is endemics in the whole civil service. On day soon the will wake up and realise that governments of every persuasion are taking them for the fools they really are.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s